PrepTest C, Section 2, Question 12
Undoubtedly, one's freedom is always worth the risk of losing one's life. Consider a person who is locked in a bare cement room with no hope of escape. This person is not really living and has nothing to lose.
Undoubtedly, one's freedom is always worth the risk of losing one's life. Consider a person who is locked in a bare cement room with no hope of escape. This person is not really living and has nothing to lose.
Undoubtedly, one's freedom is always worth the risk of losing one's life. Consider a person who is locked in a bare cement room with no hope of escape. This person is not really living and has nothing to lose.
Undoubtedly, one's freedom is always worth the risk of losing one's life. Consider a person who is locked in a bare cement room with no hope of escape. This person is not really living and has nothing to lose.
A flaw in the argument's reasoning is that the argument
presumes, without providing justification, that nothing can have greater value than one's own freedom
fails to consider that it is not always possible to rebel physically against an encroachment on one's freedom
generalizes inappropriately from a single extreme case to a universal claim
fails to establish that the freedom of others is worth taking risks for
overlooks the possibility that some people do not have the courage to take risks for freedom
0 Comments