PrepTest 94+, Section 2, Question 13
Santayana recommends that we study history to avoid the mistakes of the past. But we should not follow his advice. For, since history consists of unique and unrepeatable accidents, none of the crises we now face are the same as those our ancestors faced. Thus, studying history never enables one to avoid mistakes of the past.
Santayana recommends that we study history to avoid the mistakes of the past. But we should not follow his advice. For, since history consists of unique and unrepeatable accidents, none of the crises we now face are the same as those our ancestors faced. Thus, studying history never enables one to avoid mistakes of the past.
Santayana recommends that we study history to avoid the mistakes of the past. But we should not follow his advice. For, since history consists of unique and unrepeatable accidents, none of the crises we now face are the same as those our ancestors faced. Thus, studying history never enables one to avoid mistakes of the past.
Santayana recommends that we study history to avoid the mistakes of the past. But we should not follow his advice. For, since history consists of unique and unrepeatable accidents, none of the crises we now face are the same as those our ancestors faced. Thus, studying history never enables one to avoid mistakes of the past.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument above?
People should not study history, since doing so leads them to misunderstand the crises they now face.
Every historical period is different from every other historical period.
Although the crises one generation faces may appear to be the same as those another generation faces, they never are.
Studying history is valuable, but not for the reason that Santayana suggests.
One should not try to avoid repeating the mistakes of previous generations by studying history.
0 Comments