PrepTest 93+, Section 3, Question 17
Anarchist: People can either fight for anarchy or they can tolerate totalitarian government control. But history shows that government control of all facets of human life destroys the spirit, making life miserable. So, people should fight for anarchy, which allows each individual the freedom to pursue a personal course of happiness.
Anarchist: People can either fight for anarchy or they can tolerate totalitarian government control. But history shows that government control of all facets of human life destroys the spirit, making life miserable. So, people should fight for anarchy, which allows each individual the freedom to pursue a personal course of happiness.
Anarchist: People can either fight for anarchy or they can tolerate totalitarian government control. But history shows that government control of all facets of human life destroys the spirit, making life miserable. So, people should fight for anarchy, which allows each individual the freedom to pursue a personal course of happiness.
Anarchist: People can either fight for anarchy or they can tolerate totalitarian government control. But history shows that government control of all facets of human life destroys the spirit, making life miserable. So, people should fight for anarchy, which allows each individual the freedom to pursue a personal course of happiness.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the argument's reasoning?
Governments provide many social goods, and the argument does not attempt to explain why anarchy is a desirable alternative to government control of all facets of human life.
By asserting that people both should and should not tolerate totalitarian government, the argument contradicts itself.
The argument infers from the assertion that people should fight for anarchy that totalitarianism is objectionable.
The argument offers no indication that there is evidence for its claim that totalitarianism destroys the spirit and makes life miserable.
The argument sets out anarchy and totalitarianism as the only two political alternatives that are available.
0 Comments