PrepTest 93+, Section 2, Question 12
Art student: Great works of art evoke passionate responses in those who view them. Thus, since it is well known in art circles that the provocative work of abstract painter Ezekiel Reilly elicits intensely emotional responses in those who view them, his art is great.
Art student: Great works of art evoke passionate responses in those who view them. Thus, since it is well known in art circles that the provocative work of abstract painter Ezekiel Reilly elicits intensely emotional responses in those who view them, his art is great.
Art student: Great works of art evoke passionate responses in those who view them. Thus, since it is well known in art circles that the provocative work of abstract painter Ezekiel Reilly elicits intensely emotional responses in those who view them, his art is great.
Art student: Great works of art evoke passionate responses in those who view them. Thus, since it is well known in art circles that the provocative work of abstract painter Ezekiel Reilly elicits intensely emotional responses in those who view them, his art is great.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the argument's reasoning?
One of the premises used to support the argument's conclusion assumes the truth of that conclusion.
The argument treats a condition that is necessary for having a certain quality as if it must also be sufficient for having that quality.
The argument misapplies a general claim about the members of a class to an atypical instance of that class.
The argument contains a generalization derived from an insufficient number of instances.
The argument draws a conclusion expressing a value judgment from premises that do not involve statements about values.
0 Comments