PrepTest 93+, Section 1, Question 13
Passage A is from a newspaper article. Passage B is from UNESCO's 1999 Draft Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage.
Passage A
A North American company that found what is believed to be the HMS Sussex during expeditions in the Mediterranean from 1998 to 2001 has signed an agreement with the British government, which owns the Sussex, to raise what may be history's richest sunken treasure and to split the proceeds. The agreement is a legal breakthrough that could allow the recovery of perhaps US$4 billion in gold coins lost with the Sussex in a storm in 1694.
As robots, sonar, and other technologically advanced gear have opened the deepest oceans to exploration and recovery, governments have begun asserting ownership over their sunken vessels. But governments often lack the money and skills to retrieve cultural riches and, until now, there had been no legal precedent for a private company to join with a government to salvage the government's treasure. This agreement could end the days of freelance treasure hunting and allow nations to oversee the recovery of their lost fleets.
The company, which is funding the venture, agrees with British historians that the ship carried coins, most likely gold, worth $1 million in 1694. The US$4 billion figure is the coins' theoretical value if sold to collectors. The agreement calls for archaeological integrity—a difficult technical feat at such depths and a goal that critics of for-profit archaeology are likely to doubt. Many archaeologists abhor the sale of recovered artifacts, arguing that this inhibits scholarly analysis and public display. The agreement, however, draws a distinction between different classes of artifacts, recognizing that cultural items have greater archaeological value than coins, which it allows to be sold to help pay for the project.
Passage A is from a newspaper article. Passage B is from UNESCO's 1999 Draft Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage.
Passage A
A North American company that found what is believed to be the HMS Sussex during expeditions in the Mediterranean from 1998 to 2001 has signed an agreement with the British government, which owns the Sussex, to raise what may be history's richest sunken treasure and to split the proceeds. The agreement is a legal breakthrough that could allow the recovery of perhaps US$4 billion in gold coins lost with the Sussex in a storm in 1694.
As robots, sonar, and other technologically advanced gear have opened the deepest oceans to exploration and recovery, governments have begun asserting ownership over their sunken vessels. But governments often lack the money and skills to retrieve cultural riches and, until now, there had been no legal precedent for a private company to join with a government to salvage the government's treasure. This agreement could end the days of freelance treasure hunting and allow nations to oversee the recovery of their lost fleets.
The company, which is funding the venture, agrees with British historians that the ship carried coins, most likely gold, worth $1 million in 1694. The US$4 billion figure is the coins' theoretical value if sold to collectors. The agreement calls for archaeological integrity—a difficult technical feat at such depths and a goal that critics of for-profit archaeology are likely to doubt. Many archaeologists abhor the sale of recovered artifacts, arguing that this inhibits scholarly analysis and public display. The agreement, however, draws a distinction between different classes of artifacts, recognizing that cultural items have greater archaeological value than coins, which it allows to be sold to help pay for the project.
Passage B
"Underwater cultural heritage" (UCH) means all traces of human existence that have been partially, totally, or periodically situated underwater for at least 100 years.
1. The protection of UCH is best achieved through in situ (original site) preservation, which should be considered as the first option. Accordingly, activities directed at UCH shall be authorized by the competent authority of the concerned State only when they make a significant contribution to knowledge, protection, and/or enhancement of UCH.
2. The commercial exploitation of UCH for trade, sale, barter, or speculation...is fundamentally incompatible with the protection and proper management of the UCH.
3. Activities directed at UCH shall not adversely impact UCH more than is necessary for the objectives of the project;
4. must use nondestructive techniques and prospection and limited sampling in preference to recovery of objects. If excavation is necessary for the purpose of scientific studies, the methods and techniques used must be as nondestructive as possible and contribute to the preservation of the remains;
5. shall avoid the unnecessary disturbance of human remains or venerated sites;
6. shall be strictly regulated to ensure proper recording of historical, cultural, and archaeological information.
7. Public access to conduct activities relating to UCH that are nonintrusive (such as photography) should, where practicable, be encouraged.
Passage A is from a newspaper article. Passage B is from UNESCO's 1999 Draft Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage.
Passage A
A North American company that found what is believed to be the HMS Sussex during expeditions in the Mediterranean from 1998 to 2001 has signed an agreement with the British government, which owns the Sussex, to raise what may be history's richest sunken treasure and to split the proceeds. The agreement is a legal breakthrough that could allow the recovery of perhaps US$4 billion in gold coins lost with the Sussex in a storm in 1694.
As robots, sonar, and other technologically advanced gear have opened the deepest oceans to exploration and recovery, governments have begun asserting ownership over their sunken vessels. But governments often lack the money and skills to retrieve cultural riches and, until now, there had been no legal precedent for a private company to join with a government to salvage the government's treasure. This agreement could end the days of freelance treasure hunting and allow nations to oversee the recovery of their lost fleets.
The company, which is funding the venture, agrees with British historians that the ship carried coins, most likely gold, worth $1 million in 1694. The US$4 billion figure is the coins' theoretical value if sold to collectors. The agreement calls for archaeological integrity—a difficult technical feat at such depths and a goal that critics of for-profit archaeology are likely to doubt. Many archaeologists abhor the sale of recovered artifacts, arguing that this inhibits scholarly analysis and public display. The agreement, however, draws a distinction between different classes of artifacts, recognizing that cultural items have greater archaeological value than coins, which it allows to be sold to help pay for the project.
Passage B
"Underwater cultural heritage" (UCH) means all traces of human existence that have been partially, totally, or periodically situated underwater for at least 100 years.
1. The protection of UCH is best achieved through in situ (original site) preservation, which should be considered as the first option. Accordingly, activities directed at UCH shall be authorized by the competent authority of the concerned State only when they make a significant contribution to knowledge, protection, and/or enhancement of UCH.
2. The commercial exploitation of UCH for trade, sale, barter, or speculation...is fundamentally incompatible with the protection and proper management of the UCH.
3. Activities directed at UCH shall not adversely impact UCH more than is necessary for the objectives of the project;
4. must use nondestructive techniques and prospection and limited sampling in preference to recovery of objects. If excavation is necessary for the purpose of scientific studies, the methods and techniques used must be as nondestructive as possible and contribute to the preservation of the remains;
5. shall avoid the unnecessary disturbance of human remains or venerated sites;
6. shall be strictly regulated to ensure proper recording of historical, cultural, and archaeological information.
7. Public access to conduct activities relating to UCH that are nonintrusive (such as photography) should, where practicable, be encouraged.
Passage A is from a newspaper article. Passage B is from UNESCO's 1999 Draft Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage.
Passage A
A North American company that found what is believed to be the HMS Sussex during expeditions in the Mediterranean from 1998 to 2001 has signed an agreement with the British government, which owns the Sussex, to raise what may be history's richest sunken treasure and to split the proceeds. The agreement is a legal breakthrough that could allow the recovery of perhaps US$4 billion in gold coins lost with the Sussex in a storm in 1694.
As robots, sonar, and other technologically advanced gear have opened the deepest oceans to exploration and recovery, governments have begun asserting ownership over their sunken vessels. But governments often lack the money and skills to retrieve cultural riches and, until now, there had been no legal precedent for a private company to join with a government to salvage the government's treasure. This agreement could end the days of freelance treasure hunting and allow nations to oversee the recovery of their lost fleets.
The company, which is funding the venture, agrees with British historians that the ship carried coins, most likely gold, worth $1 million in 1694. The US$4 billion figure is the coins' theoretical value if sold to collectors. The agreement calls for archaeological integrity—a difficult technical feat at such depths and a goal that critics of for-profit archaeology are likely to doubt. Many archaeologists abhor the sale of recovered artifacts, arguing that this inhibits scholarly analysis and public display. The agreement, however, draws a distinction between different classes of artifacts, recognizing that cultural items have greater archaeological value than coins, which it allows to be sold to help pay for the project.
Which one of the following projects would most clearly not fall within the scope of the provisions specified in passage B?
The recovery of a sunken eighteenth-century Spanish treasure fleet by private, freelance treasure hunters.
The recovery of a nineteenth-century shipwreck of unknown origin in one of the Great Lakes.
The recovery of underwater artifacts from the ruins of a long-submerged ancient city built when sea levels were much lower than they are today.
The recovery of the cargo of a privately owned merchant ship that sank in 1970 off the coast of Ireland.
The recovery of prehistoric cultural artifacts recently uncovered by the damming and rerouting of a major river.
0 Comments