PrepTest 92+, Section 1, Question 20
Mr. Klemke argues that the complaints recently lodged against his roofing company are unfounded, on the grounds that each of the complainants disagrees with Klemke's widely known political views and is therefore biased. However, having a different political outlook from Klemke's would in no way prevent one from being badly treated by his company. Clearly, then, the complaints are not, as Mr. Klemke alleges, unfounded.
Mr. Klemke argues that the complaints recently lodged against his roofing company are unfounded, on the grounds that each of the complainants disagrees with Klemke's widely known political views and is therefore biased. However, having a different political outlook from Klemke's would in no way prevent one from being badly treated by his company. Clearly, then, the complaints are not, as Mr. Klemke alleges, unfounded.
Mr. Klemke argues that the complaints recently lodged against his roofing company are unfounded, on the grounds that each of the complainants disagrees with Klemke's widely known political views and is therefore biased. However, having a different political outlook from Klemke's would in no way prevent one from being badly treated by his company. Clearly, then, the complaints are not, as Mr. Klemke alleges, unfounded.
Mr. Klemke argues that the complaints recently lodged against his roofing company are unfounded, on the grounds that each of the complainants disagrees with Klemke's widely known political views and is therefore biased. However, having a different political outlook from Klemke's would in no way prevent one from being badly treated by his company. Clearly, then, the complaints are not, as Mr. Klemke alleges, unfounded.
The argument against Mr. Klemke's allegation is flawed in that it
takes a consequence of someone's being biased to be a cause of the bias
concludes that a claim is false on the grounds that an inadequate argument has been given for it
rejects an argument on the grounds that the person who offered the argument is biased
relies on a sample of opinions that is unlikely to represent diverse political outlooks
overlooks the possibility that people whose views diverge are unaware of their disagreement
0 Comments