PrepTest 90+, Section 4, Question 1
The government's tax collection agency has not followed through on its plan, announced a year ago, to crack down on violations of corporate income tax law. Audits are the primary tool for detecting such violations, and over the past year, not a single audit of corporate income tax returns has been completed.
The government's tax collection agency has not followed through on its plan, announced a year ago, to crack down on violations of corporate income tax law. Audits are the primary tool for detecting such violations, and over the past year, not a single audit of corporate income tax returns has been completed.
The government's tax collection agency has not followed through on its plan, announced a year ago, to crack down on violations of corporate income tax law. Audits are the primary tool for detecting such violations, and over the past year, not a single audit of corporate income tax returns has been completed.
The government's tax collection agency has not followed through on its plan, announced a year ago, to crack down on violations of corporate income tax law. Audits are the primary tool for detecting such violations, and over the past year, not a single audit of corporate income tax returns has been completed.
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
The plan to crack down on violations of corporate income tax law is part of a broad campaign against corporate misconduct.
The number of personal income tax returns audited over the past year is greater than in previous years.
Most audits of corporate income tax returns do not reveal any significant violations.
It generally takes longer than one year to complete an audit of a corporate income tax return.
Over the last five years, fewer audits of corporate income tax returns have been completed than in the preceding five years.
0 Comments