PrepTest 90+, Section 3, Question 4
An investigator is trying to determine the order in which five successive phone calls were made—one call each to Quinn, Roth, Smith, Teng, and Vitt. Each call was of one of two types—local or nonlocal. The following facts have been established thus far:
An investigator is trying to determine the order in which five successive phone calls were made—one call each to Quinn, Roth, Smith, Teng, and Vitt. Each call was of one of two types—local or nonlocal. The following facts have been established thus far:
An investigator is trying to determine the order in which five successive phone calls were made—one call each to Quinn, Roth, Smith, Teng, and Vitt. Each call was of one of two types—local or nonlocal. The following facts have been established thus far:
An investigator is trying to determine the order in which five successive phone calls were made—one call each to Quinn, Roth, Smith, Teng, and Vitt. Each call was of one of two types—local or nonlocal. The following facts have been established thus far:
Quinn's call was immediately before Vitt's but at some time after Smith's.
Smith's call was of a different type than Vitt's.
Quinn's call and Teng's call were both local.
The third call was nonlocal.
If Roth's call was local, then which one of the following must be false?
Quinn's call was fourth.
Roth's call was second.
Smith's call was second.
Teng's call was first.
Vitt's call was fifth.
0 Comments