PrepTest 89, Section 2, Question 16
Philosopher: Groups are not the type of entity that can be worthy of praise or blame. Blameworthiness implies conscience and agency. Nations do not have consciences. Families are not agents. Hence, any ascription of praise or blame to a group must be translated into some statement about individuals if we are to evaluate it properly.
Philosopher: Groups are not the type of entity that can be worthy of praise or blame. Blameworthiness implies conscience and agency. Nations do not have consciences. Families are not agents. Hence, any ascription of praise or blame to a group must be translated into some statement about individuals if we are to evaluate it properly.
Philosopher: Groups are not the type of entity that can be worthy of praise or blame. Blameworthiness implies conscience and agency. Nations do not have consciences. Families are not agents. Hence, any ascription of praise or blame to a group must be translated into some statement about individuals if we are to evaluate it properly.
Philosopher: Groups are not the type of entity that can be worthy of praise or blame. Blameworthiness implies conscience and agency. Nations do not have consciences. Families are not agents. Hence, any ascription of praise or blame to a group must be translated into some statement about individuals if we are to evaluate it properly.
Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the philosopher's argument by the claim that nations do not have consciences?
It is an intermediate conclusion offered as direct support for the argument's main conclusion.
It is offered as support for an intermediate conclusion that is in turn offered as direct support for the argument's main conclusion.
It is cited as an implication of the main conclusion drawn in the argument.
It is cited as an instance of a general conclusion drawn in the argument.
It is the main conclusion drawn in the argument.
0 Comments