PrepTest 88, Section 3, Question 14
People's antagonism to development in their neighborhoods can be harmful to a city. For example, nightclubs tend to be unpopular with neighbors because of the late hours they keep. So if neighborhoods are allowed to block new nightclubs, a city will never get new nightclubs.
People's antagonism to development in their neighborhoods can be harmful to a city. For example, nightclubs tend to be unpopular with neighbors because of the late hours they keep. So if neighborhoods are allowed to block new nightclubs, a city will never get new nightclubs.
People's antagonism to development in their neighborhoods can be harmful to a city. For example, nightclubs tend to be unpopular with neighbors because of the late hours they keep. So if neighborhoods are allowed to block new nightclubs, a city will never get new nightclubs.
People's antagonism to development in their neighborhoods can be harmful to a city. For example, nightclubs tend to be unpopular with neighbors because of the late hours they keep. So if neighborhoods are allowed to block new nightclubs, a city will never get new nightclubs.
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
New nightclubs would usually be approved if the decision whether to approve was made at the city level.
All neighborhoods in a city are equally opposed to getting new nightclubs.
It is a bad thing for a city if the city never gets new nightclubs.
Restaurants that do not keep late hours are rarely unpopular with neighbors.
New nightclubs invariably produce some benefits for the neighborhoods in which they open.
0 Comments