PrepTest 84, Section 3, Question 25
Essayist writing in 2012: At its onset, a new medium is limited to carrying content from the old medium it replaces. We are in that phase with e-books—today's e-books take their content from print books. Thus it is too early to understand the e-book as a medium, since it has not yet taken its ultimate form.
Essayist writing in 2012: At its onset, a new medium is limited to carrying content from the old medium it replaces. We are in that phase with e-books—today's e-books take their content from print books. Thus it is too early to understand the e-book as a medium, since it has not yet taken its ultimate form.
Essayist writing in 2012: At its onset, a new medium is limited to carrying content from the old medium it replaces. We are in that phase with e-books—today's e-books take their content from print books. Thus it is too early to understand the e-book as a medium, since it has not yet taken its ultimate form.
Essayist writing in 2012: At its onset, a new medium is limited to carrying content from the old medium it replaces. We are in that phase with e-books—today's e-books take their content from print books. Thus it is too early to understand the e-book as a medium, since it has not yet taken its ultimate form.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the essayist's reasoning?
A medium cannot be fully understood without first understanding the media that came before it.
No electronic medium can resemble a print medium more than it resembles other electronic media.
The ultimate form that a medium will take depends on available technology.
A medium cannot be understood without observing the evolution of its content.
One medium can replace another only if it can represent richer and more varied content.
Explanations
0 Comments