PrepTest 81, Section 3, Question 23
If a piece of legislation is the result of negotiation and compromise between competing interest groups, it will not satisfy any of those groups. So, we can see that the recently enacted trade agreement represents a series of compromises among the various interest groups that are concerned with it, because all of those groups are clearly unhappy with it.
If a piece of legislation is the result of negotiation and compromise between competing interest groups, it will not satisfy any of those groups. So, we can see that the recently enacted trade agreement represents a series of compromises among the various interest groups that are concerned with it, because all of those groups are clearly unhappy with it.
If a piece of legislation is the result of negotiation and compromise between competing interest groups, it will not satisfy any of those groups. So, we can see that the recently enacted trade agreement represents a series of compromises among the various interest groups that are concerned with it, because all of those groups are clearly unhappy with it.
If a piece of legislation is the result of negotiation and compromise between competing interest groups, it will not satisfy any of those groups. So, we can see that the recently enacted trade agreement represents a series of compromises among the various interest groups that are concerned with it, because all of those groups are clearly unhappy with it.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a logical flaw in the argument?
It draws a conclusion that is merely a disguised restatement of one of its premises.
It concludes that a condition is necessary for a certain result merely from the claim that the condition leads to that result.
It relies on understanding a key term in a quite different way in the conclusion from the way that term is understood in the premises.
It takes for granted that no piece of legislation can ever satisfy all competing interest groups.
It bases a conclusion about a particular case on a general principle that concerns a different kind of case.
0 Comments