PrepTest 80, Section 3, Question 17
When expert witnesses give testimony, jurors often do not understand the technical information and thereby are in no position to evaluate such testimony. Although expert witnesses on opposite sides often make conflicting claims, the expert witnesses on both sides frequently seem competent, leaving the jury unable to assess the reliability of their testimonies.
When expert witnesses give testimony, jurors often do not understand the technical information and thereby are in no position to evaluate such testimony. Although expert witnesses on opposite sides often make conflicting claims, the expert witnesses on both sides frequently seem competent, leaving the jury unable to assess the reliability of their testimonies.
When expert witnesses give testimony, jurors often do not understand the technical information and thereby are in no position to evaluate such testimony. Although expert witnesses on opposite sides often make conflicting claims, the expert witnesses on both sides frequently seem competent, leaving the jury unable to assess the reliability of their testimonies.
When expert witnesses give testimony, jurors often do not understand the technical information and thereby are in no position to evaluate such testimony. Although expert witnesses on opposite sides often make conflicting claims, the expert witnesses on both sides frequently seem competent, leaving the jury unable to assess the reliability of their testimonies.
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?
There should be limits placed on how much technical information can be considered by both sides in preparing a legal case.
Jury decisions in cases involving expert witness testimonies are not always determined by the reliability of those testimonies.
Jurors who understand the technical information presented in a case can usually assess its legal implications accurately.
Jury members should generally be selected on the basis of their technical expertise.
Expert witnesses who testify on opposite sides in legal cases are likely to agree in their evaluations of technical claims.
0 Comments