PrepTest 80, Section 2, Question 3
Whether or not one can rightfully call a person's faithfulness a virtue depends in part on the object of that person's faithfulness. Virtues are by definition praiseworthy, which is why no one considers resentment virtuous, even though it is in fact a kind of faithfulness�faithfulness to hatreds or animosities.
Whether or not one can rightfully call a person's faithfulness a virtue depends in part on the object of that person's faithfulness. Virtues are by definition praiseworthy, which is why no one considers resentment virtuous, even though it is in fact a kind of faithfulness�faithfulness to hatreds or animosities.
Whether or not one can rightfully call a person's faithfulness a virtue depends in part on the object of that person's faithfulness. Virtues are by definition praiseworthy, which is why no one considers resentment virtuous, even though it is in fact a kind of faithfulness�faithfulness to hatreds or animosities.
Whether or not one can rightfully call a person's faithfulness a virtue depends in part on the object of that person's faithfulness. Virtues are by definition praiseworthy, which is why no one considers resentment virtuous, even though it is in fact a kind of faithfulness�faithfulness to hatreds or animosities.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the argument?
The object of a person's faithfulness partially determines whether or not that faithfulness is virtuous.
Virtuous behavior is praiseworthy by definition.
Behavior that emerges from hatred or animosity cannot be called virtuous.
Faithfulness and resentment are obviously different, despite some similarities.
Resentment should not be considered a virtuous emotion.
0 Comments