PrepTest 77, Section 2, Question 22
Everyone should have access to more than one newspaper, for there are at least two sides to every story. Since all sides of an important story should be covered, and no newspaper adequately covers all sides of every one of its stories, some important stories would not be adequately covered if there were only one newspaper.
Everyone should have access to more than one newspaper, for there are at least two sides to every story. Since all sides of an important story should be covered, and no newspaper adequately covers all sides of every one of its stories, some important stories would not be adequately covered if there were only one newspaper.
Everyone should have access to more than one newspaper, for there are at least two sides to every story. Since all sides of an important story should be covered, and no newspaper adequately covers all sides of every one of its stories, some important stories would not be adequately covered if there were only one newspaper.
Everyone should have access to more than one newspaper, for there are at least two sides to every story. Since all sides of an important story should be covered, and no newspaper adequately covers all sides of every one of its stories, some important stories would not be adequately covered if there were only one newspaper.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the reasoning of the argument?
The argument confuses the inability to cover all sides of every story with the inability to cover all sides of any important story.
The argument overlooks the possibility that two newspapers could provide the same incomplete coverage of the same important stories.
A conclusion about what newspapers should do is inferred solely from statements about what newspapers in fact do.
The argument takes for granted that everyone has access to all newspapers.
The argument is concerned only with important stories and not with all stories.
0 Comments