PrepTest 72, Section 3, Question 3
Restaurant owner: The newspaper reporter who panned my restaurant acknowledges having no special expertise about food and its preparation. His previous job was as a political reporter. He is a good writer, but he is not a true restaurant critic. A newspaper would never call someone a drama critic who had no special training in theater.
Restaurant owner: The newspaper reporter who panned my restaurant acknowledges having no special expertise about food and its preparation. His previous job was as a political reporter. He is a good writer, but he is not a true restaurant critic. A newspaper would never call someone a drama critic who had no special training in theater.
Restaurant owner: The newspaper reporter who panned my restaurant acknowledges having no special expertise about food and its preparation. His previous job was as a political reporter. He is a good writer, but he is not a true restaurant critic. A newspaper would never call someone a drama critic who had no special training in theater.
Restaurant owner: The newspaper reporter who panned my restaurant acknowledges having no special expertise about food and its preparation. His previous job was as a political reporter. He is a good writer, but he is not a true restaurant critic. A newspaper would never call someone a drama critic who had no special training in theater.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the restaurant owner's argument?
The newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant acknowledges having no special expertise about food and its preparation.
The previous job of the newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant was as a political reporter.
The newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant is a good writer.
The newspaper reporter who panned the restaurant is not a true restaurant critic.
A newspaper would never call someone a drama critic who had no special training in theater.
0 Comments