PrepTest 72, Section 2, Question 5
Jenkins maintains that the movie Firepower was not intended to provoke antisocial behavior, arguing that, on the contrary, it is in the interest of Firepower's director to prevent such behavior. Yet Jenkins's conclusion must be rejected, because the movie has clearly produced antisocial behavior among many of those who have seen it.
Jenkins maintains that the movie Firepower was not intended to provoke antisocial behavior, arguing that, on the contrary, it is in the interest of Firepower's director to prevent such behavior. Yet Jenkins's conclusion must be rejected, because the movie has clearly produced antisocial behavior among many of those who have seen it.
Jenkins maintains that the movie Firepower was not intended to provoke antisocial behavior, arguing that, on the contrary, it is in the interest of Firepower's director to prevent such behavior. Yet Jenkins's conclusion must be rejected, because the movie has clearly produced antisocial behavior among many of those who have seen it.
Jenkins maintains that the movie Firepower was not intended to provoke antisocial behavior, arguing that, on the contrary, it is in the interest of Firepower's director to prevent such behavior. Yet Jenkins's conclusion must be rejected, because the movie has clearly produced antisocial behavior among many of those who have seen it.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed in that it
rejects an argument on the grounds that it was offered by a person who was biased
concludes from a mere correlation between certain phenomena that those phenomena are causally related
infers that something is true of a whole solely on the grounds that it is true of a part of the whole
overlooks the possibility that people can act in a way that is contrary to their expressed interest
concludes from the mere fact that an action had a certain effect that the effect was intended by the person who performed the action
0 Comments