PrepTest 69, Section 2, Question 7
The photographs that the store developed were quite unsatisfactory. The customer claims to have handled the film correctly. Neither the film nor the camera was defective. If a store does not process pictures properly, the customer is owed a refund, so if the customer's claim is correct, the store owes her a refund.
The photographs that the store developed were quite unsatisfactory. The customer claims to have handled the film correctly. Neither the film nor the camera was defective. If a store does not process pictures properly, the customer is owed a refund, so if the customer's claim is correct, the store owes her a refund.
The photographs that the store developed were quite unsatisfactory. The customer claims to have handled the film correctly. Neither the film nor the camera was defective. If a store does not process pictures properly, the customer is owed a refund, so if the customer's claim is correct, the store owes her a refund.
The photographs that the store developed were quite unsatisfactory. The customer claims to have handled the film correctly. Neither the film nor the camera was defective. If a store does not process pictures properly, the customer is owed a refund, so if the customer's claim is correct, the store owes her a refund.
The argument relies on assuming which one of the following?
If the store owes the customer a refund, then neither the camera nor the film was defective.
If neither the film nor the camera was defective, and the customer handled the film correctly, then the store processed it improperly.
If pictures are taken with a defective camera, then it is not possible for the store to develop those pictures improperly.
If the customer handled the film incorrectly, that is what caused the photographs that the store developed to be unsatisfactory.
If the customer's claim was not correct, then the store does not owe her a refund.
0 Comments