PrepTest 66, Section 3, Question 4
Company spokesperson: Household Products magazine claims that our Filterator X water filter does not remove chemical contaminants in significant amounts. This attack on the quality of our product is undermined by the experience of the millions of Filterator X owners who are satisfied with the product's performance.
Company spokesperson: Household Products magazine claims that our Filterator X water filter does not remove chemical contaminants in significant amounts. This attack on the quality of our product is undermined by the experience of the millions of Filterator X owners who are satisfied with the product's performance.
Company spokesperson: Household Products magazine claims that our Filterator X water filter does not remove chemical contaminants in significant amounts. This attack on the quality of our product is undermined by the experience of the millions of Filterator X owners who are satisfied with the product's performance.
Company spokesperson: Household Products magazine claims that our Filterator X water filter does not remove chemical contaminants in significant amounts. This attack on the quality of our product is undermined by the experience of the millions of Filterator X owners who are satisfied with the product's performance.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the company spokesperson's argument?
Household Products did not evaluate whether the Filterator X water filter significantly improved the taste of drinking water.
Most Filterator X owners have no way to determine how effectively the product removes chemical contaminants from water.
People whose household water contains chemical contaminants are more likely than other people to buy a Filterator X water filter.
Very few people who own a Filterator X read Household Products on a consistent basis.
Household Products' evaluations of Filterator X water filters have been consistently negative.
0 Comments