PrepTest 65, Section 2, Question 8
The proportion of fat calories in the diets of people who read the nutrition labels on food products is significantly lower than it is in the diets of people who do not read nutrition labels. This shows that reading these labels promotes healthful dietary behavior.
The proportion of fat calories in the diets of people who read the nutrition labels on food products is significantly lower than it is in the diets of people who do not read nutrition labels. This shows that reading these labels promotes healthful dietary behavior.
The proportion of fat calories in the diets of people who read the nutrition labels on food products is significantly lower than it is in the diets of people who do not read nutrition labels. This shows that reading these labels promotes healthful dietary behavior.
The proportion of fat calories in the diets of people who read the nutrition labels on food products is significantly lower than it is in the diets of people who do not read nutrition labels. This shows that reading these labels promotes healthful dietary behavior.
The reasoning in the argument above is flawed in that the argument
illicitly infers a cause from a correlation
relies on a sample that is unlikely to be representative of the group as a whole
confuses a condition that is necessary for a phenomenon to occur with a condition that is sufficient for that phenomenon to occur
takes for granted that there are only two possible alternative explanations of a phenomenon
draws a conclusion about the intentions of a group of people based solely on data about the consequences of their behavior
0 Comments