PrepTest 64, Section 3, Question 7
Tanner: The public should demand political debates before any election. Voters are better able to choose the candidate best suited for office if they watch the candidates seriously debate one another.
Tanner: The public should demand political debates before any election. Voters are better able to choose the candidate best suited for office if they watch the candidates seriously debate one another.
Saldana: Political debates almost always benefit the candidate who has the better debating skills. Thus, they don't really help voters determine which candidate is most qualified for office.
Tanner: The public should demand political debates before any election. Voters are better able to choose the candidate best suited for office if they watch the candidates seriously debate one another.
Saldana: Political debates almost always benefit the candidate who has the better debating skills. Thus, they don't really help voters determine which candidate is most qualified for office.
Tanner: The public should demand political debates before any election. Voters are better able to choose the candidate best suited for office if they watch the candidates seriously debate one another.
The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Tanner and Saldana disagree over which one of the following?
Political candidates with strong debating skills are more likely to win elections than those with weak debating skills.
A voter who watches a political debate will likely be better able, as a result, to determine which candidate is more qualified for office.
Debating skills are of little use to politicians in doing their jobs once they are elected to office.
The candidates with the best debating skills are the ones who are most qualified for the political offices for which they are running.
Political debates tend to have a major effect on which candidate among those participating in a debate will win the election.
0 Comments