PrepTest 64, Section 3, Question 11
Sigerson argues that the city should adopt ethical guidelines that preclude its politicians from accepting campaign contributions from companies that do business with the city. Sigerson's proposal is dishonest, however, because he has taken contributions from such companies throughout his career in city politics.
Sigerson argues that the city should adopt ethical guidelines that preclude its politicians from accepting campaign contributions from companies that do business with the city. Sigerson's proposal is dishonest, however, because he has taken contributions from such companies throughout his career in city politics.
Sigerson argues that the city should adopt ethical guidelines that preclude its politicians from accepting campaign contributions from companies that do business with the city. Sigerson's proposal is dishonest, however, because he has taken contributions from such companies throughout his career in city politics.
Sigerson argues that the city should adopt ethical guidelines that preclude its politicians from accepting campaign contributions from companies that do business with the city. Sigerson's proposal is dishonest, however, because he has taken contributions from such companies throughout his career in city politics.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
confuses a sufficient condition for adopting ethical guidelines for politicians with a necessary condition for adopting such guidelines
rejects a proposal on the grounds that an inadequate argument has been given for it
fails to adequately address the possibility that other city politicians would resist Sigerson's proposal
rejects a proposal on the grounds that the person offering it is unfamiliar with the issues it raises
overlooks the fact that Sigerson's proposal would apply only to the future conduct of city politicians
0 Comments