PrepTest 60, Section 3, Question 16
Wildlife management experts should not interfere with the natural habitats of creatures in the wild, because manipulating the environment to make it easier for an endangered species to survive in a habitat invariably makes it harder for nonendangered species to survive in that habitat.
Wildlife management experts should not interfere with the natural habitats of creatures in the wild, because manipulating the environment to make it easier for an endangered species to survive in a habitat invariably makes it harder for nonendangered species to survive in that habitat.
Wildlife management experts should not interfere with the natural habitats of creatures in the wild, because manipulating the environment to make it easier for an endangered species to survive in a habitat invariably makes it harder for nonendangered species to survive in that habitat.
Wildlife management experts should not interfere with the natural habitats of creatures in the wild, because manipulating the environment to make it easier for an endangered species to survive in a habitat invariably makes it harder for nonendangered species to survive in that habitat.
The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
fails to consider that wildlife management experts probably know best how to facilitate the survival of an endangered species in a habitat
fails to recognize that a nonendangered species can easily become an endangered species
overlooks the possibility that saving an endangered species in a habitat is incompatible with preserving the overall diversity of species in that habitat
presumes, without providing justification, that the survival of each endangered species is equally important to the health of the environment
takes for granted that preserving a currently endangered species in a habitat does not have higher priority than preserving species in that habitat that are not endangered
0 Comments