PrepTest 52, Section 3, Question 12
No matter how conscientious they are, historians always have biases that affect their work. Hence, rather than trying to interpret historical events, historians should instead interpret what the people who participated in historical events thought about those events.
No matter how conscientious they are, historians always have biases that affect their work. Hence, rather than trying to interpret historical events, historians should instead interpret what the people who participated in historical events thought about those events.
No matter how conscientious they are, historians always have biases that affect their work. Hence, rather than trying to interpret historical events, historians should instead interpret what the people who participated in historical events thought about those events.
No matter how conscientious they are, historians always have biases that affect their work. Hence, rather than trying to interpret historical events, historians should instead interpret what the people who participated in historical events thought about those events.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument fails to consider the possibility that
historians who have different biases often agree about many aspects of some historical events
scholars in disciplines other than history also risk having their biases affect their work
many of the ways in which historians' biases affect their work have been identified
not all historians are aware of the effect that their particular biases have on their work
the proposed shift in focus is unlikely to eliminate the effect that historians' biases have on their work
0 Comments