PrepTest 50, Section 2, Question 23
In scientific journals, authors and reviewers have praised companies in which they have substantial investments. These scientists, with their potential conflict of interest, call into question the integrity of scientific inquiry, so there should be full public disclosure of scientific authors' commercial holdings.
In scientific journals, authors and reviewers have praised companies in which they have substantial investments. These scientists, with their potential conflict of interest, call into question the integrity of scientific inquiry, so there should be full public disclosure of scientific authors' commercial holdings.
In scientific journals, authors and reviewers have praised companies in which they have substantial investments. These scientists, with their potential conflict of interest, call into question the integrity of scientific inquiry, so there should be full public disclosure of scientific authors' commercial holdings.
In scientific journals, authors and reviewers have praised companies in which they have substantial investments. These scientists, with their potential conflict of interest, call into question the integrity of scientific inquiry, so there should be full public disclosure of scientific authors' commercial holdings.
Which one of the following conforms most closely to the principle illustrated by the argument above?
Managers within any corporation should not make investments in the companies for which they work.
Claims about the effectiveness of pharmaceuticals should be based on scientific studies.
People with access to otherwise private information regarding the value of stocks should not be allowed to sell or purchase those stocks.
Magazine publishers should not be allowed to invest in the companies that advertise in their magazines.
Financial advisers should inform their clients about any incentives the advisers receive for promoting investments in particular companies.
0 Comments