PrepTest 47, Section 3, Question 10
Naturalist: To be dependable, the accounting framework used by national economists to advise the government must take into account all of our nation's assets; but the current accounting framework used by our national economists assigns no value to government-owned natural resources, which are clearly assets.
Naturalist: To be dependable, the accounting framework used by national economists to advise the government must take into account all of our nation's assets; but the current accounting framework used by our national economists assigns no value to government-owned natural resources, which are clearly assets.
Naturalist: To be dependable, the accounting framework used by national economists to advise the government must take into account all of our nation's assets; but the current accounting framework used by our national economists assigns no value to government-owned natural resources, which are clearly assets.
Naturalist: To be dependable, the accounting framework used by national economists to advise the government must take into account all of our nation's assets; but the current accounting framework used by our national economists assigns no value to government-owned natural resources, which are clearly assets.
The naturalist's statements, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?
Economists' indifference toward the destruction of natural resources will lead policymakers to make poor decisions.
Naturalists and economists disagree about whether natural resources have value.
The accounting framework used by national economists is not reliable.
Natural resources are a vital economic asset for every nation.
Changes in the environment have a value that is not represented in any accounting framework.
0 Comments