PrepTest 42, Section 2, Question 11
Inez: The book we are reading, The Nature of Matter, is mistitled. A title should summarize the content of the whole book, but nearly half of this book is devoted to discussing a different, albeit closely related subject: energy.
Inez: The book we are reading, The Nature of Matter, is mistitled. A title should summarize the content of the whole book, but nearly half of this book is devoted to discussing a different, albeit closely related subject: energy.
Antonio: I do not think that the author erred; according to modern physics, matter and energy are two facets of the same phenomenon.
Inez: The book we are reading, The Nature of Matter, is mistitled. A title should summarize the content of the whole book, but nearly half of this book is devoted to discussing a different, albeit closely related subject: energy.
Antonio: I do not think that the author erred; according to modern physics, matter and energy are two facets of the same phenomenon.
Inez: The book we are reading, The Nature of Matter, is mistitled. A title should summarize the content of the whole book, but nearly half of this book is devoted to discussing a different, albeit closely related subject: energy.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the conversation above?
Inez believes that the book should be called The Nature of Energy.
Antonio believes that there are no differences between matter and energy.
Inez and Antonio disagree on whether matter and energy are related.
Inez and Antonio disagree about the overall value of the book.
Inez believes that the book's title should not mention matter without mentioning energy.
0 Comments