PrepTest 39, Section 3, Question 21
In a small town, every complaint filed about a plumber's work was filed against Moore, who has a relatively small business. So there is good evidence that Moore is a poor plumber who cannot be counted on to do a good job.
In a small town, every complaint filed about a plumber's work was filed against Moore, who has a relatively small business. So there is good evidence that Moore is a poor plumber who cannot be counted on to do a good job.
In a small town, every complaint filed about a plumber's work was filed against Moore, who has a relatively small business. So there is good evidence that Moore is a poor plumber who cannot be counted on to do a good job.
In a small town, every complaint filed about a plumber's work was filed against Moore, who has a relatively small business. So there is good evidence that Moore is a poor plumber who cannot be counted on to do a good job.
The argument is questionable because it fails to consider
the interests of Moore's customers who have not filed complaints
that there may be few if any other plumbers working in Moore's town
whether Moore's business is too small to warrant the kind of generalization drawn
the number of complaints filed in Moore's town about tradespeople other than plumbers
whether each person who was dissatisfied with Moore's work filed a complaint against Moore
0 Comments