PrepTest 39, Section 2, Question 2
Any course that teaches students how to write is one that will serve them well in later life. Therefore, since some philosophy courses teach students how to write, any student, whatever his or her major, will be served well in later life by taking any philosophy course.
Any course that teaches students how to write is one that will serve them well in later life. Therefore, since some philosophy courses teach students how to write, any student, whatever his or her major, will be served well in later life by taking any philosophy course.
Any course that teaches students how to write is one that will serve them well in later life. Therefore, since some philosophy courses teach students how to write, any student, whatever his or her major, will be served well in later life by taking any philosophy course.
Any course that teaches students how to write is one that will serve them well in later life. Therefore, since some philosophy courses teach students how to write, any student, whatever his or her major, will be served well in later life by taking any philosophy course.
A flaw in the reasoning of the argument is that the argument
fails to specify adequately exactly how a course can teach students how to write
draws a weaker conclusion than is warranted by the strength of its premises
presumes, without providing justification, that what is true of a whole must also be true of each of its constituent parts
fails to consider the possibility that some students in certain majors may be required to take a philosophy course
draws a conclusion about all cases of a certain kind on the basis of evidence that justifies such a conclusion only about some cases of that kind
0 Comments