PrepTest 34, Section 2, Question 23
To be horrific, a monster must be threatening. Whether or not it presents psychological, moral, or social dangers, or triggers enduring infantile fears, if a monster is physically dangerous then it is threatening. In fact, even a physically benign monster is horrific if it inspires revulsion.
To be horrific, a monster must be threatening. Whether or not it presents psychological, moral, or social dangers, or triggers enduring infantile fears, if a monster is physically dangerous then it is threatening. In fact, even a physically benign monster is horrific if it inspires revulsion.
To be horrific, a monster must be threatening. Whether or not it presents psychological, moral, or social dangers, or triggers enduring infantile fears, if a monster is physically dangerous then it is threatening. In fact, even a physically benign monster is horrific if it inspires revulsion.
To be horrific, a monster must be threatening. Whether or not it presents psychological, moral, or social dangers, or triggers enduring infantile fears, if a monster is physically dangerous then it is threatening. In fact, even a physically benign monster is horrific if it inspires revulsion.
Which one of the following logically follows from the statements above?
Any horror-story monster that is threatening is also horrific.
A monster that is psychologically dangerous, but that does not inspire revulsion, is not horrific.
If a monster triggers infantile fears but is not physically dangerous, then it is not horrific.
If a monster is both horrific and psychologically threatening, then it does not inspire revulsion.
All monsters that are not physically dangerous, but that are psychologically dangerous and inspire revulsion, are threatening.
0 Comments